Emme [Partecipante] 0 Inviato 1 Settembre 2005 Condividi Inviato 1 Settembre 2005 Girellando su fastseduction ho trovato questo post. Mi sembra interessante. Che ne dite? -------------------- You go out to the club. You just opened a girl then jumped into some routines, gotten her laughing and giggling. You jokingly flirt with your wingman like he's your boyfriend. The girl touches you and you say "Hands off the merchandise." Everything's going well. but then she leaves to dance, or to see her friends, or. something, and you don't see her again. That wouldn't be too upsetting, but it's the fourth set of the night. That you lost like that. And your numbers aren't panning out when you get them. What's going on here? There's a style of game that gets guys into conversation and gets reactions that are seemingly positive from women without getting you real results. The problem is that it's all flash. you're not really getting anywhere. A solid interaction that leads to sex or a relationship usually doesn't look too impressive to onlookers. If they catch you opening her, they'll be impressed, but within a few minutes, you'll look like old friends catching up. A few minutes later and it'll look like you're her boyfriend. When Woodhaven introduced Natural Game, some thought it was called that because it was a style used by "naturals" - Not the case. It's called Natural Game because it's what women naturally respond to. It's broken down from successful seductions across the ages, and it works. When you carry an interaction seductively, in a natural, cool way, you get results. You get women. When you entertain, and be flashy, it looks good if you're trying to impress a guy nearby, but it doesn't get real results with the woman at nearly the frequency of a cool, natural approach. Some instructors demonstrate flash game to impress their students. It impresses, too: If a guy has never gotten with a woman off a cold approach, how would he know what a good interaction looks like? The barrage of joking around, crazy routines, and flashy stuff looks like just what the guy was missing: But it's not. How many approaches have you done without getting consistently good results? Anyone who says you need 1000 approaches before you're at all good is full of shit: Flash game takes that long to get rolling because it's a poor formula. You're trying to make bad game work okay (and getting really bad habits in the process). Flash game might be better than nothing. You're going to get more results spitting out ridiculous nonsense than you will sitting at home eating potato chips. But if you've done even dozens of approaches and you don't feel like you're getting further along each time, it's time to reanalyze your game. Flash game might look cool for your buddies, but take it to the next level and start getting the women you want. Dimitri http://www.rapidsocialimpact.com ------------------- Ciao! Link al commento Condividi su altri siti More sharing options...
Messaggi raccomandati
Crea un account o accedi per lasciare un commento
Devi essere un membro per lasciare un commento
Crea un account
Iscriviti per un nuovo account nella nostra community. È facile!
Registra un nuovo accountAccedi
Sei già registrato? Accedi qui.
Accedi Ora